# HG changeset patch
# User Sean Halle <seanhalle@yahoo.com>
# Date 1340148727 25200
# Node ID 959587ac4044aa96abe11a39c9da9ea11c917a82
# Parent  f0d056109bdd15e14dad914d11e006ae28973da6
General -- cleanup

diff -r f0d056109bdd -r 959587ac4044 0__Papers/VMS/VMS__Foundation_Paper/VMS__Full_conference_version/figures/2.png
Binary file 0__Papers/VMS/VMS__Foundation_Paper/VMS__Full_conference_version/figures/2.png has changed
diff -r f0d056109bdd -r 959587ac4044 0__Papers/VMS/VMS__Foundation_Paper/VMS__Full_conference_version/helpers/07_F_26__The_Questions__blank.txt
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/0__Papers/VMS/VMS__Foundation_Paper/VMS__Full_conference_version/helpers/07_F_26__The_Questions__blank.txt	Tue Jun 19 16:32:07 2012 -0700
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+
+
+1) What are the problems the authors are trying to solve? 
+    When done, for each problem, how does one decide the value of a proposed solution?  Suggest a priority domain for deciding whether to use a proposed solution.
+
+The problem is 
+
+A priority domain for deciding the value of some proposed solution to this problem is
+
+The value of this solution is determined by
+
+
+
+2) What "things" does the proposed solution to this problem enable?
+     What benefit to reader is bought by each "thing", & what related to the "thing", gives the benefit.
+     What details are unique about the proposed solution that enables the thing that gives benefit?
+     How does that uniqueness enable or achieve the thing?
+
+It enables
+
+The benefit to me is
+
+Unique details of solution that enable the thing gives benefit are 
+
+The uniqueness enables the thing that gives benefit by
+
+
+
+3) What are the fundamentals underlying the problem?  
+     What makes this problem hard? 
+     What are the basic elements and forces of the problem that the proposed solution has to be in terms of, avoid, use to advantage? ie: gravity, invariant relationships, market forces, human capacity (avg level of real programmers, hubris, legacy is held onto, barriers to adoption), and so on
+How does the proposed solution work within/relate to/address/take advantage of/deal with the fundamentals underlying the problem?
+
+The fundamentals are
+
+The hard part is
+
+The basic elements are
+
+The proposed solution
+
+
+
+4) What are other approaches and conventional wisdom to solving these problems?
+    What benefits enabled by the proposed solution are not enabled by other work, and vice versa?
+    How does each approach address something the others miss?
+    Try to suggest groupings or categories for the various approaches.  
+    Try to suggest ways multiple approaches may be combined to get more pros with fewer cons.
+
+Other approaches are
+
+A benefit enabled by the proposed that is not enabled by other work is
+
+Categories:
+
+Combining:
+
+
+
+5) What is/are the unique main "things" that enable what the proposed solution does?
+    Sketch the details of each of these "things".  
+    Did you detect any drawbacks, not stated in the paper, from the details?
+    Did you see any really cool techniques?
+
+Unique main "things" are
+
+Drawbacks from details:
+
+Idea of
+
+
+
+6) What aspects of the implementation/proof/design need results given in order to convince you that the proposed solution delivers the stated benefits?
+
+They have to show
+
+
+
+7) What results did they show?
+       Did they show results in all the needed aspects (which were left out)?
+       Were the testing method and results shown good enough to convince you?
+       Did you detect any cons, not stated in the paper, from the results?
+
+They showed 
+
+Con..  
+
+
+
+8) How do you think this work may provide some value to you in your future research?
+
+The work my provide value for me
+
+
+
+3 or more comments/questions:  (pick out the most important things to you from the discussion you gave above, or add things that were not brought out by the above questions.  I am asking for these as things to bring up during class).
+
+1)
+
+ 
\ No newline at end of file