changeset 57:959587ac4044

General -- cleanup
author Sean Halle <seanhalle@yahoo.com>
date Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:32:07 -0700
parents f0d056109bdd
children 2db21884dc2e
files 0__Papers/VMS/VMS__Foundation_Paper/VMS__Full_conference_version/figures/2.png 0__Papers/VMS/VMS__Foundation_Paper/VMS__Full_conference_version/helpers/07_F_26__The_Questions__blank.txt
diffstat 2 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) [+]
line diff
     1.1 Binary file 0__Papers/VMS/VMS__Foundation_Paper/VMS__Full_conference_version/figures/2.png has changed
     2.1 --- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
     2.2 +++ b/0__Papers/VMS/VMS__Foundation_Paper/VMS__Full_conference_version/helpers/07_F_26__The_Questions__blank.txt	Tue Jun 19 16:32:07 2012 -0700
     2.3 @@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
     2.4 +
     2.5 +
     2.6 +1) What are the problems the authors are trying to solve? 
     2.7 +    When done, for each problem, how does one decide the value of a proposed solution?  Suggest a priority domain for deciding whether to use a proposed solution.
     2.8 +
     2.9 +The problem is 
    2.10 +
    2.11 +A priority domain for deciding the value of some proposed solution to this problem is
    2.12 +
    2.13 +The value of this solution is determined by
    2.14 +
    2.15 +
    2.16 +
    2.17 +2) What "things" does the proposed solution to this problem enable?
    2.18 +     What benefit to reader is bought by each "thing", & what related to the "thing", gives the benefit.
    2.19 +     What details are unique about the proposed solution that enables the thing that gives benefit?
    2.20 +     How does that uniqueness enable or achieve the thing?
    2.21 +
    2.22 +It enables
    2.23 +
    2.24 +The benefit to me is
    2.25 +
    2.26 +Unique details of solution that enable the thing gives benefit are 
    2.27 +
    2.28 +The uniqueness enables the thing that gives benefit by
    2.29 +
    2.30 +
    2.31 +
    2.32 +3) What are the fundamentals underlying the problem?  
    2.33 +     What makes this problem hard? 
    2.34 +     What are the basic elements and forces of the problem that the proposed solution has to be in terms of, avoid, use to advantage? ie: gravity, invariant relationships, market forces, human capacity (avg level of real programmers, hubris, legacy is held onto, barriers to adoption), and so on
    2.35 +How does the proposed solution work within/relate to/address/take advantage of/deal with the fundamentals underlying the problem?
    2.36 +
    2.37 +The fundamentals are
    2.38 +
    2.39 +The hard part is
    2.40 +
    2.41 +The basic elements are
    2.42 +
    2.43 +The proposed solution
    2.44 +
    2.45 +
    2.46 +
    2.47 +4) What are other approaches and conventional wisdom to solving these problems?
    2.48 +    What benefits enabled by the proposed solution are not enabled by other work, and vice versa?
    2.49 +    How does each approach address something the others miss?
    2.50 +    Try to suggest groupings or categories for the various approaches.  
    2.51 +    Try to suggest ways multiple approaches may be combined to get more pros with fewer cons.
    2.52 +
    2.53 +Other approaches are
    2.54 +
    2.55 +A benefit enabled by the proposed that is not enabled by other work is
    2.56 +
    2.57 +Categories:
    2.58 +
    2.59 +Combining:
    2.60 +
    2.61 +
    2.62 +
    2.63 +5) What is/are the unique main "things" that enable what the proposed solution does?
    2.64 +    Sketch the details of each of these "things".  
    2.65 +    Did you detect any drawbacks, not stated in the paper, from the details?
    2.66 +    Did you see any really cool techniques?
    2.67 +
    2.68 +Unique main "things" are
    2.69 +
    2.70 +Drawbacks from details:
    2.71 +
    2.72 +Idea of
    2.73 +
    2.74 +
    2.75 +
    2.76 +6) What aspects of the implementation/proof/design need results given in order to convince you that the proposed solution delivers the stated benefits?
    2.77 +
    2.78 +They have to show
    2.79 +
    2.80 +
    2.81 +
    2.82 +7) What results did they show?
    2.83 +       Did they show results in all the needed aspects (which were left out)?
    2.84 +       Were the testing method and results shown good enough to convince you?
    2.85 +       Did you detect any cons, not stated in the paper, from the results?
    2.86 +
    2.87 +They showed 
    2.88 +
    2.89 +Con..  
    2.90 +
    2.91 +
    2.92 +
    2.93 +8) How do you think this work may provide some value to you in your future research?
    2.94 +
    2.95 +The work my provide value for me
    2.96 +
    2.97 +
    2.98 +
    2.99 +3 or more comments/questions:  (pick out the most important things to you from the discussion you gave above, or add things that were not brought out by the above questions.  I am asking for these as things to bring up during class).
   2.100 +
   2.101 +1)
   2.102 +
   2.103 + 
   2.104 \ No newline at end of file