Mercurial > cgi-bin > hgwebdir.cgi > VMS > 0__Writings > kshalle
changeset 57:959587ac4044
General -- cleanup
author | Sean Halle <seanhalle@yahoo.com> |
---|---|
date | Tue, 19 Jun 2012 16:32:07 -0700 |
parents | f0d056109bdd |
children | 2db21884dc2e |
files | 0__Papers/VMS/VMS__Foundation_Paper/VMS__Full_conference_version/figures/2.png 0__Papers/VMS/VMS__Foundation_Paper/VMS__Full_conference_version/helpers/07_F_26__The_Questions__blank.txt |
diffstat | 2 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) [+] |
line diff
1.1 Binary file 0__Papers/VMS/VMS__Foundation_Paper/VMS__Full_conference_version/figures/2.png has changed
2.1 --- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 2.2 +++ b/0__Papers/VMS/VMS__Foundation_Paper/VMS__Full_conference_version/helpers/07_F_26__The_Questions__blank.txt Tue Jun 19 16:32:07 2012 -0700 2.3 @@ -0,0 +1,100 @@ 2.4 + 2.5 + 2.6 +1) What are the problems the authors are trying to solve? 2.7 + When done, for each problem, how does one decide the value of a proposed solution? Suggest a priority domain for deciding whether to use a proposed solution. 2.8 + 2.9 +The problem is 2.10 + 2.11 +A priority domain for deciding the value of some proposed solution to this problem is 2.12 + 2.13 +The value of this solution is determined by 2.14 + 2.15 + 2.16 + 2.17 +2) What "things" does the proposed solution to this problem enable? 2.18 + What benefit to reader is bought by each "thing", & what related to the "thing", gives the benefit. 2.19 + What details are unique about the proposed solution that enables the thing that gives benefit? 2.20 + How does that uniqueness enable or achieve the thing? 2.21 + 2.22 +It enables 2.23 + 2.24 +The benefit to me is 2.25 + 2.26 +Unique details of solution that enable the thing gives benefit are 2.27 + 2.28 +The uniqueness enables the thing that gives benefit by 2.29 + 2.30 + 2.31 + 2.32 +3) What are the fundamentals underlying the problem? 2.33 + What makes this problem hard? 2.34 + What are the basic elements and forces of the problem that the proposed solution has to be in terms of, avoid, use to advantage? ie: gravity, invariant relationships, market forces, human capacity (avg level of real programmers, hubris, legacy is held onto, barriers to adoption), and so on 2.35 +How does the proposed solution work within/relate to/address/take advantage of/deal with the fundamentals underlying the problem? 2.36 + 2.37 +The fundamentals are 2.38 + 2.39 +The hard part is 2.40 + 2.41 +The basic elements are 2.42 + 2.43 +The proposed solution 2.44 + 2.45 + 2.46 + 2.47 +4) What are other approaches and conventional wisdom to solving these problems? 2.48 + What benefits enabled by the proposed solution are not enabled by other work, and vice versa? 2.49 + How does each approach address something the others miss? 2.50 + Try to suggest groupings or categories for the various approaches. 2.51 + Try to suggest ways multiple approaches may be combined to get more pros with fewer cons. 2.52 + 2.53 +Other approaches are 2.54 + 2.55 +A benefit enabled by the proposed that is not enabled by other work is 2.56 + 2.57 +Categories: 2.58 + 2.59 +Combining: 2.60 + 2.61 + 2.62 + 2.63 +5) What is/are the unique main "things" that enable what the proposed solution does? 2.64 + Sketch the details of each of these "things". 2.65 + Did you detect any drawbacks, not stated in the paper, from the details? 2.66 + Did you see any really cool techniques? 2.67 + 2.68 +Unique main "things" are 2.69 + 2.70 +Drawbacks from details: 2.71 + 2.72 +Idea of 2.73 + 2.74 + 2.75 + 2.76 +6) What aspects of the implementation/proof/design need results given in order to convince you that the proposed solution delivers the stated benefits? 2.77 + 2.78 +They have to show 2.79 + 2.80 + 2.81 + 2.82 +7) What results did they show? 2.83 + Did they show results in all the needed aspects (which were left out)? 2.84 + Were the testing method and results shown good enough to convince you? 2.85 + Did you detect any cons, not stated in the paper, from the results? 2.86 + 2.87 +They showed 2.88 + 2.89 +Con.. 2.90 + 2.91 + 2.92 + 2.93 +8) How do you think this work may provide some value to you in your future research? 2.94 + 2.95 +The work my provide value for me 2.96 + 2.97 + 2.98 + 2.99 +3 or more comments/questions: (pick out the most important things to you from the discussion you gave above, or add things that were not brought out by the above questions. I am asking for these as things to bring up during class). 2.100 + 2.101 +1) 2.102 + 2.103 + 2.104 \ No newline at end of file